Skip to content

Tables: Small-Scale Sand Filters

Back to source | Source PDF | Structured table records

Table fragments retain their source context. Refer to the original page for layout, figures, merged headings and notes.

1. Table 1

BMP 2026, Ch 9.9, p. 1

N.J.A.C. 7:8 Stormwater Management Rules – Applicable Design and Performance Standards
Green Infrastructure Yes
Stormwater Runoff Quantity Yes, when designed as an on-line system
GR Groundwater Recharge Yes
% Stormwater Runoff Quality 80% TSS
Stormwater Runoff Quality Mechanisms and Corresponding Criteria
--- ---
Settling
Storage Volume Entire Water Quality Design Storm Volume
Filtration
Maximum Contributory Drainage Area 2.5 acres
Maximum Design Storm Drain Time 72 hours, using slowest design permeability rate
Sand bed minimum thickness 18 inches
Maximum storage above sand bed 24 inches
Maximum design permeability rate of sand bed 2 inches/hour
Minimum topsoil permeability rate, if using optional vegetative cover 2x the permeability of the subsoil
Source context and notes Source revision: January 2026. # 9.9 SMALL-SCALE SAND FILTERS (GI) [Figure: img-0.jpeg (original PDF, p. 1)](SOURCE.pdf#page=1) Small-scale sand filters are stormwater management systems designed to maximize the removal of pollutants from stormwater runoff. A small-scale sand filter consists of a pre-treatment zone and a treatment zone, which includes the sand bed as the filter media and its underlying materials. Pollutants are treated through settling, filtration and adsorption by the sand bed prior to discharging stormwater runoff by infiltration into the subsoil. The total suspended solids (TSS) removal rate is 80%. | N.J.A.C. 7:8 Stormwater Management Rules – Applicable Design and Performance Standards | | | | --- | --- | --- | | | Green Infrastructure | Yes | | | Stormwater Runoff Quantity | Yes, when designed as an on-line system | | GR | Groundwater Recharge | Yes | | % | Stormwater Runoff Quality | 80% TSS | | Stormwater Runoff Quality Mechanisms and Corresponding Criteria | | | --- | --- | | Settling | | | Storage Volume | Entire Water Quality Design Storm Volume | | Filtration | | | Maximum Contributory Drainage Area | 2.5 acres | | Maximum Design Storm Drain Time | 72 hours, using slowest design permeability rate | | Sand bed minimum thickness | 18 inches | | Maximum storage above sand bed | 24 inches | | Maximum design permeability rate of sand bed | 2 inches/hour | | Minimum topsoil permeability rate, if using optional vegetative cover | 2x the permeability of the subsoil |

2. Table 2

BMP 2026, Ch 9.9, p. 12

Area = 1 acre
CN Value = 98 (100% Impervious)
Calculated WQDS Runoff Volume = 3,755 cf
Forebay Primary Outflow: Perforated Riser Pipe
Forebay Secondary Outflow: Broad-crested Weir
Sand Bed Permeability Rate = 2 inches/hour
Subsoil Permeability Rate = 8 inches/hour
Forebay Surface Elevation = 1.10 ft
Sand Bed Surface Elevation = 0.00 ft
Assumed Depth of Stormwater Runoff to be infiltrated = 1 ft above the small-scale sand filter surface
Source context and notes - Small-scale sand filters with the detention option may be designed to treat and temporarily store stormwater runoff produced by both small storms, such as the WQDS, and larger storms such as the 2-, 10- and 100-year design storms. - Exfiltration can be used in the design of a small-scale sand filter designed to provide detention for stormwater runoff quantity control, provided all of the conditions regarding the use of exfiltration in stormwater runoff calculations published in Chapter 5 are met. This information is published in the section beginning on Page 8 of Chapter 5, entitled "Conditions Regarding the Use of Exfiltration in Stormwater Runoff Calculations." # Designing A Small-Scale Sand Filter The example below illustrates how to design a small-scale sand filter to treat the stormwater runoff generated by the WQDS. The following parameters apply: | Area = | 1 acre | | --- | --- | | CN Value = | 98 (100% Impervious) | | Calculated WQDS Runoff Volume = | 3,755 cf | | Forebay Primary Outflow: | Perforated Riser Pipe | | Forebay Secondary Outflow: | Broad-crested Weir | | Sand Bed Permeability Rate = | 2 inches/hour | | Subsoil Permeability Rate = | 8 inches/hour | | Forebay Surface Elevation = | 1.10 ft | | Sand Bed Surface Elevation = | 0.00 ft | | Assumed Depth of Stormwater Runoff to be infiltrated = | 1 ft above the small-scale sand filter surface | # Step 1: Forebay Sizing The forebay must be sized to hold 10% of the WQDS volume. Assuming the depth of stormwater runoff in the forebay is equal to the depth of the WQDS in the surface of the small-scale sand filter system, which is assumed to be 1 ft, a rectangular forebay with a width of 20 ft and a length of 20 ft will provide adequate storage volume. However, in order to facilitate drainage, the water surface elevation in the forebay must be greater than the water surface elevation in the small-scale sand filter; in addition, the perforations in the riser pipe must be designed to ensure that the forebay will drain within 9 hours.

3. Table 3

BMP 2026, Ch 9.9, p. 13

Inflow Area = 43,560 sf,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.03"
Inflow = 2.90 cfs @ 1.09 hrs, Volume= 3,755 cf
Outflow = 0.14 cfs @ 1.89 hrs, Volume= 3,755 cf, Atten= 95%, Lag= 47.6 min
Discarded = 0.14 cfs @ 0.70 hrs, Volume= 3,755 cf
Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.89 hrs, Volume= 0 cf
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 1.98' @ 1.88 hrs Surf.Area= 1,520 sf Storage= 3,013 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 186.7 min calculated for 3,755 cf (100% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 186.6 min (256.9 - 70.3)
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 0.00' 6,080 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc)
Elevation (feet) Surf.Area (sq-ft) Inc.Store (cubic-feet) Cum.Store (cubic-feet)
0.00 1,520 0 0
4.00 1,520 6,080 6,080
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 0.00' 4.00 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
#2 Primary 1.98' 4.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.14 cfs @ 0.70 hrs HW=0.04' (Free Discharge)
+1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.14 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.89 hrs HW=1.98' (Free Discharge)
+2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.00 cfs @ 0.13 fps)
Source context and notes In this example, the WQDS water surface elevation (W.S.E.) in the forebay is 2.15 ft; this translates to a depth of 1.05 ft, with the additional 0.05 ft of depth resulting from head loss in the riser pipe. Based on the above elevations, the top of the riser pipe is set at an elevation of 2.20 ft. A grate or trash rack must be installed on the top of the riser to keep floatables from entering the riser pipe during large storm events. ## Step 2: Small-Scale Sand Filter Sizing When designing a small-scale sand filter, the permeability of the subsoil can affect the design permeability of the entire system; as previously stated, the maximum design permeability of any small-scale sand filter system is 10 in/hr and the maximum permeability of the sand bed, for the purpose of calculations, is 2 in/hr. In this example, the tested subsoil permeability rate is 8 in/hr and the design subsoil permeability rate is therefore 4 in/hr. The design subsoil permeability rate is used as the exfiltration rate in the routing calculation. By trial and error, the sand bed area is 1,520 sf and the highest depth of stormwater runoff collected in the system during the WQDS is 1.98 ft. The invert of the orifice of the riser can be set at 1.98 ft above the sand bed. A summary report and routing table excerpt from modelling software is provided below and on the following page. ## Summary Report: | Inflow Area = 43,560 sf,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.03" | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Inflow = 2.90 cfs @ 1.09 hrs, Volume= 3,755 cf | | | | | Outflow = 0.14 cfs @ 1.89 hrs, Volume= 3,755 cf, Atten= 95%, Lag= 47.6 min | | | | | Discarded = 0.14 cfs @ 0.70 hrs, Volume= 3,755 cf | | | | | Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.89 hrs, Volume= 0 cf | | | | | Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs | | | | | Peak Elev= 1.98' @ 1.88 hrs Surf.Area= 1,520 sf Storage= 3,013 cf | | | | | Plug-Flow detention time= 186.7 min calculated for 3,755 cf (100% of inflow) | | | | | Center-of-Mass det. time= 186.6 min (256.9 - 70.3) | | | | | Volume | Invert | Avail.Storage | Storage Description | | #1 | 0.00' | 6,080 cf | Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) | | Elevation (feet) | Surf.Area (sq-ft) | Inc.Store (cubic-feet) | Cum.Store (cubic-feet) | | 0.00 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | | 4.00 | 1,520 | 6,080 | 6,080 | | Device | Routing | Invert | Outlet Devices | | #1 | Discarded | 0.00' | 4.00 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area | | #2 | Primary | 1.98' | 4.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads | | Discarded OutFlow Max=0.14 cfs @ 0.70 hrs HW=0.04' (Free Discharge) | | | | | +1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.14 cfs) | | | | | Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.89 hrs HW=1.98' (Free Discharge) | | | | | +2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.00 cfs @ 0.13 fps) | | | | Source: HydroCAD® Summary Report; HydroCAD is a register trademark of HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC. Used with permission.

4. Table 4

BMP 2026, Ch 9.9, p. 14

Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) Discarded (cfs) Primary (cfs)
0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.10 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.20 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.30 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.40 0.02 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.50 0.07 12 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.00
0.60 0.15 33 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.00
0.70 0.22 62 0.04 0.14 0.14 0.00
0.80 0.30 102 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.00
0.90 0.63 211 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.00
1.00 1.84 558 0.37 0.14 0.14 0.00
1.10 2.89 1,403 0.92 0.14 0.14 0.00
1.20 1.60 2,197 1.45 0.14 0.14 0.00
1.30 0.76 2,552 1.68 0.14 0.14 0.00
1.40 0.44 2,705 1.78 0.14 0.14 0.00
1.50 0.39 2,801 1.84 0.14 0.14 0.00
1.60 0.33 2,883 1.90 0.14 0.14 0.00
1.70 0.30 2,944 1.94 0.14 0.14 0.00
1.80 0.26 2,997 1.97 0.14 0.14 0.00
1.90 0.12 3,012 1.98 0.14 0.14 0.00
2.00 0.10 3,000 1.97 0.14 0.14 0.00
2.10 0.04 2,977 1.96 0.14 0.14 0.00
2.20 0.00 2,931 1.93 0.14 0.14 0.00
2.30 0.00 2,881 1.90 0.14 0.14 0.00
2.40 0.00 2,830 1.86 0.14 0.14 0.00
Source context and notes # Small-Scale Sand Filters Source revision: January 2026. WQDS Routing Table Excerpt: | Time (hours) | Inflow (cfs) | Storage (cubic-feet) | Elevation (feet) | Outflow (cfs) | Discarded (cfs) | Primary (cfs) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | 0.40 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | 0.50 | 0.07 | 12 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | | 0.60 | 0.15 | 33 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.00 | | 0.70 | 0.22 | 62 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 0.80 | 0.30 | 102 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 0.90 | 0.63 | 211 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 1.00 | 1.84 | 558 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 1.10 | 2.89 | 1,403 | 0.92 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 1.20 | 1.60 | 2,197 | 1.45 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 1.30 | 0.76 | 2,552 | 1.68 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 1.40 | 0.44 | 2,705 | 1.78 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 1.50 | 0.39 | 2,801 | 1.84 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 1.60 | 0.33 | 2,883 | 1.90 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 1.70 | 0.30 | 2,944 | 1.94 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 1.80 | 0.26 | 2,997 | 1.97 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 1.90 | 0.12 | 3,012 | 1.98 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 2.00 | 0.10 | 3,000 | 1.97 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 2.10 | 0.04 | 2,977 | 1.96 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 2.20 | 0.00 | 2,931 | 1.93 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2,881 | 1.90 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | | 2.40 | 0.00 | 2,830 | 1.86 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | Source: HydroCAD® Output; HydroCAD is a registered trademark of HydroCAD Soft-ware Solutions LLC. Used with permission. ## Step 3: Check the drain time $$ \text{Drain Time} = \frac{\text{WQDS Runoff Volume}}{\text{System Infiltration Area} \times \text{Subsoil Design Permeability Rate}} = \frac{3,755\ \text{cf}}{(1,520\ \text{sf} \times 4\ \text{in/hr} \times 1\ \text{ft}/12\ \text{in})} = 7.41\ \text{hr} $$

Images on table pages

Page associations do not establish that a crop depicts a specific table.