Skip to content

Tables: Low Impact Development Techniques

Back to source | Source PDF | Structured table records

Table fragments retain their source context. Refer to the original page for layout, figures, merged headings and notes.

1. Table 1

BMP 2004, Ch 2, p. 18

Area (sf) Land Use HSG
17214 Lawn (good condition) B
10256 Lawn (good condition) C
3436 Impervious (directly connected) B
1764 Impervious (directly connected) C
Source context and notes $\mathrm{P}_2 = 3.3$ inches, $\mathrm{P}_{10} = 5.2$ inches, and $\mathrm{P}_{100} = 7.5$ inch Vegetated Area, $\mathrm{Tc} = 0.32$ hours 125 If sheet flow, $1.6\%$ slope, $\mathrm{n} = 0.24$ 135 If shallow conc flow, $1.4\%$ slope, unpaved | Area (sf) | Land Use | HSG | | --- | --- | --- | | 17214 | Lawn (good condition) | B | | 10256 | Lawn (good condition) | C | | 3436 | Impervious (directly connected) | B | | 1764 | Impervious (directly connected) | C |

2. Table 2

BMP 2004, Ch 2, p. 19

Area (sf) Land Use HSG
17524 Woods (good condition) B
1564 Lawn (good condition) B
1876 Lawn (good condition) C
Source context and notes Nonstructural stormwater management strategies used: minimized land disturbance; minimized compaction; maximized the protection of vegetation; minimized the decrease in post-development time of concentration through retaining existing wooded area; and minimized and disconnected impervious cover. Vegetated Area, $\mathrm{Tc} = 0.52$ hours 125 lf sheet flow, $1.3\%$ slope, $\mathrm{n} = 0.40$ 135 lf shallow conc flow, $2.1\%$ slope, unpaved | Area (sf) | Land Use | HSG | | --- | --- | --- | | 17524 | Woods (good condition) | B | | 1564 | Lawn (good condition) | B | | 1876 | Lawn (good condition) | C | Unconnected Impervious Area, $\mathrm{Tc} = 0.23$ hours 100 lf sheet flow, $2.1\%$ slope, $\mathrm{n} = 0.24$ Note: The time of concentration was developed from the receiving pervious area alone.

3. Table 3

BMP 2004, Ch 2, p. 19

Distribution of Pervious Areas Receiving Unconnected Impervious Area Runoff
Area (sf) Land Use HSG
1562 Lawn (good condition) B
7344 Lawn (good condition) C
Source context and notes | 1876 | Lawn (good condition) | C | Unconnected Impervious Area, $\mathrm{Tc} = 0.23$ hours 100 lf sheet flow, $2.1\%$ slope, $\mathrm{n} = 0.24$ Note: The time of concentration was developed from the receiving pervious area alone. | Distribution of Pervious Areas Receiving Unconnected Impervious Area Runoff | | | | --- | --- | --- | | Area (sf) | Land Use | HSG | | 1562 | Lawn (good condition) | B | | 7344 | Lawn (good condition) | C |

4. Table 4

BMP 2004, Ch 2, p. 20

Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions (Standard Development) Proposed Conditions (Nonstructural Stormwater Management Strategies)
Two-Step Method NRCS Method
2-year 0.15 cfs 0.48 cfs 0.29 cfs 0.27 cfs
0.030 ac-ft 0.067 ac-ft 0.043 ac-ft 0.041 ac-ft
10-year 0.62 cfs 1.18 cfs .81 cfs .78 cfs
0.093 ac-ft 0.150 ac-ft 0.116 ac-ft 0.109 ac-ft
100-year 1.35 cfs 2.19 cfs 1.61 cfs 1.58 cfs
0.192 ac-ft 0.261 ac-ft 0.214 ac-ft 0.211 ac-ft
Source context and notes # Low Impact Development Techniques Source revision: February 2004. # Peak Flow Rates and Volumes | | Existing Conditions | Proposed Conditions (Standard Development) | Proposed Conditions (Nonstructural Stormwater Management Strategies) | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | Two-Step Method | NRCS Method | | 2-year | 0.15 cfs | 0.48 cfs | 0.29 cfs | 0.27 cfs | | | 0.030 ac-ft | 0.067 ac-ft | 0.043 ac-ft | 0.041 ac-ft | | 10-year | 0.62 cfs | 1.18 cfs | .81 cfs | .78 cfs | | | 0.093 ac-ft | 0.150 ac-ft | 0.116 ac-ft | 0.109 ac-ft | | 100-year | 1.35 cfs | 2.19 cfs | 1.61 cfs | 1.58 cfs | | | 0.192 ac-ft | 0.261 ac-ft | 0.214 ac-ft | 0.211 ac-ft |

Images on table pages

Page associations do not establish that a crop depicts a specific table.